Tuesday, 29 July 2014

The debate focuses on mitochondrial decay and mitohormesis

What have scientists found to fight the leading cause of skin aging – mitochondrial decay?
In our previous post, entitled “Theories of Aging”, we discussed how oxidative damage is regarded in the scientific community as the primary cause of aging, and how mitochondria play a significant role in this by being a major source of free radicals.
Now, scientists have made a breakthrough in fighting the leading cause of skin aging: Schisandrins have been proven to effectively reverse mitochondrial decay.
A recap of our previous discussion
Mitochondrial decay in aging refers to a progressive disruption to mitochondrial
structural integrity and functional ability over time. Consequently, cells experience impaired energy production, a decline in normal function, and accelerated free radical generation. This is the phenomenon of cellular aging, which makes the cell more prone to apoptosis, or programmed cell death – much like cell suicide.
Skin aging – the signs of which are commonly manifested in wrinkles, fine lines, age spots, loss of suppleness, and deterioration of skin tone – has been proven to involve mitochondrial dysfunction.
The mitochondria–free radical connection
Research has shown that mitochondria are a major source of free radicals. Deteriorating mitochondria instigate a vicious cycle of exacerbated oxidative stress. Consistent with these findings is the concept that “manipulating the signaling pathways that regulate cellular antioxidant defense” and “controlling the intracellular levels of free radicals” is preferred over “altering individual antioxidant components by extrinsic supplementation”.
In simpler terms, this means that it may be more effective to combat aging by treating the source of free radical production rather than by “cleaning up” free radicals after they are generated. This theory is supported by recent studies that have found that scavenging free radicals through the supplementation of certain antioxidants could be ineffective or even harmful in the long run.i ii
i Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention – Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Bjelakovic et al; Journal of the American Medical Association 2007; 297(8):842-857 (doi:10.1001/jama.297.8.842).
ii Vitamins in Aging, Health, and Longevity, David R Thomas; The Division of Geriatric Medicine, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, Saint Louis, MO, USA.

  • So far the discussion has centered on theories of aging, with which I have no particular bone to pick. But this is not the crux of the debate. Glissandra claims that it’s mechanism of action is related to hormesis, a construct that says simply “what doesn’t kill you you makes you stronger”. However, i would be quick to add “what doesn’t kill you quickly may lead to chronic inflammatory disorders and slow death”. It’s all about the timing, dosing, signaling, molecular interactions, etc. In other words, the devil is in the details.
    Let me also say that I am a believer in hormesis and it’s therapeutic potential as a basic physiologic principle. The best known application may be exercise. It stresses physical systems, but they then recover and are stronger the next time challenged. Simple enough. But consider what would happen if you exercised all the time. I once had a patient who was obsessed with body fat and literally exercised herself to death. Exercise requires both a period of intense activity, and a period of recovery, to be beneficial. So, let me take a leap of logic and presume that this product causes a metabolic stress to the mitochondria of skin cells. But, it is not applied for an hour 3 times a week, it is applied twice daily, every day, assuming a constant rate of diffusion / absorption over that 12 hours from the cream. Toughens skin up (those cells that don’t die from the damage)? But wait – no recovery period. Won’t that just lead to chronic “cell danger response” signaling, and inflammation, with no down time to adapt? Maybe if the product sellers said to use it for a few days a month and then stop ….. at least that would match the paradigm.
    Also, this theory it does not comport well with what we know about the skin in responding to chronic oxidative stress. The most salient example? UV stress. We experience it daily, chronically, and the damage to skin accumulates over time. Yes, we have adaptive responses (e.g. repairing DNA damage every night, kill off and replace the worst damaged cells, create more melanin as a filter to sunlight). But even sunlight is only for half the day. But the adaptations don’t completely compensate for the stresses. Over time, the the system deteriorates. Skin ages. Too much of this stress and it also gets cancer. As the theory goes, what doesn’t kill you may toughen you. Perhaps the flip side is true – what doesn’t toughen you may end up killing you.
    I remain open to hormesis as a potentially beneficial mode of action for a dermal therapeutic, but would need to see specific evidence that ties a cyclical cellular stress to an adaptive (anti-inflammatory) response that is ultimately beneficial and does not lead to chronic inflammation and its consequences like disease, cancers, and aging itself.

Dr. John,
Thank you for your thoughtful question.
Glissandra (ie schisandrin B) differs from other conventional hormetic agents in that it has a wide range of effective doses which are non-toxic to normal cells. Schisandrin B is chemically transformed in various cells by cytochrome P-450 enzymes and thus produces signalling reactive oxygen species (ROS) which do not cause pathogenic oxidative stress. Instead, the ROS will elicit a glutathione antioxidant response, particularly in mitochondria, which results in mitohormesis - a process that can be induced by blocking insulin signaling, dietary restriction and physical exercise, which are all shown to be effective to prolong a healthy lifespan. Schisandrin B work in the same way in skin cells. The safeguard of mitochondrial function and antioxidant defense is beneficial to retard the skin aging caused by intrinsic (ROS) and extrinsic factors (solar radiation).
I look forward to our continuing to share more science behind our Glissandra products line.
Robert

Wednesday, 16 July 2014

Show me the Science! Show me the Results! Don't show me Photoshop!

I thought I would share some photos of real customers that have used our anti-aging skincare line with Glissandrin™.

There is always controversy when people look at before and after photos. This is because of the explosion of photos on the internet and company websites and ad campaigns that are obviously photoshopped or altered in some way.

They just are not believable. Let's take a look at a post on the BFT website.

http://barefacedtruth.com/2014/05/25/ladies-tell-us-doesnt-get-just-little-pissed-ceramides-part-1/


I mean really, do you believe this isn't photoshopped?


How about this one - I mean seriously! No wonder nobody believes before and after photos!

So how do you show a before and after photo and have people believe they are real?

First, I believe that a selfie is much more believable than a professional photo. A photo you take of yourself with your smartphone is much more likely to be real.

Second, make sure the public, yes YOU, can see who the person really is. YOU can see they are not an actor or stock photo. I am sure we all have seen examples of the same before and after photo being used in different ad campaigns for different companies! How do you accomplish this? Simple. Put a link to the person's Social Media page so you can see they are a real person. Someone you can connect with and even pick up the phone and speak to.

Third, I believe the best before and after photo is your own photo. If you don't see personal results, how can you convince others how effective the product is.

Having said that, here are my own photos. I just took a photo today, which marks just over 9 months of using Glissandra on a daily basis. I'm a guy...I'm a bit lazy and I only use it on average once a day in the mornings. You can find my LinkedIn profile at: ca.linkedin.com/pub/craig-peloquin/86/540/649

Let me share a couple of recent after photos taken on July 11th. I was there with Susan and Ron when the photos were taken and I helped them upload their before and after photos to their LinkedIn profile. 

This is Susan Brillon and her LinkedIn profile can be found at: ca.linkedin.com/in/susanbrillon


Here is Ron Borse and his LinkedIn profile can be found at ca.linkedin.com/pub/ron-borse/8a/693/9a7





Tuesday, 1 July 2014

Retinoids and Retin-A

This post is in response to a BFT reader, Robert who posted:

Robert
Some of us out here in “Cyberspace” were not born yesterday and realize that Tretinoin (Retin-A), was available far earlier than this Glissandra goop. And not to mention the fact that Retin-A has been proven to reduce the signs of aging with decades of real science.
http://barefacedtruth.com/2014/06/25/from-theory-to-glissandra/#comment-130907

Robert,

Wow! It certainly doesn't take much to derail a debate on the science. The purpose of this debate is to discuss the science behind the ingredients. Glissandra contains Glissandrin™, a proprietary blend of Schisandrin A, B, C and (-)B, not "goop".

If you want to discuss the benefits of Tretinoin, that's great. We can post some of the science and side effects behind retinoids. There are no known side effects to Schisandrin B.

Audrey Kunin, MD on http://www.dermadoctor.com/blog/retin-a-retinoids-retinol-vitamin-a-creams/ writes:

Retin A was developed more than 30 years ago as an acne treatment. It's actually a twisted form of the Vitamin A molecule. Dermatologists prescribe it not just for acne but for a wide variety of other skin concerns that respond to exfoliating agents and "keratolytics" (a product that removes a plug out of a hair follicle or sweat gland. Since then a wide range of prescription molecules have been developed as well as their cosmetic counterparts.

Here is a link to read more about the side effects:

http://www.medicinenet.com/tretinoin-topical/page2.htm#SideEffects

I still don't see what this has to do with our marketing term, Bioceutical.

Craig